Preferences

[LEJA0506]

Given there is high demand for non lethal non chloro and on this tiny (can’t be used for real ha) sample, why do we think ko’s are so rare in mainstream & porn movies?
It seems like a gap in the market, it’s mainly killing & chloro.

[Jack_079]

why do we think ko’s are so rare in mainstream & porn movies?
It seems like a gap in the market, it’s mainly killing & chloro.

My guess is producers are being either lazy or unimaginative.

[cuccut59579]

For me, I prefer KO over killing (but no blood or gore), but I like to see the victim' rolled eyes in the aftermatch.

For the take down method, I like a quick and hard punch, a neckchop, or a choking, but maybe not to death... anything that leaves the hopeless expression on the victim's face when she was going down.

A big fan of dragging, I kinda like the 1 leg dragging pose in the Hitman series.

I love a good aftermatch scenes too, although sometime it's good to leave it to imagination but most the time it's nice to see a beautiful naked lady lying around in some cabinet. And I think it's just my thing that I like to see the victim huliminated a bit, not so much as something sexual like they usually do in porn, but gagging her with her own pantie or tie her up with her own stoking is a win for me.

[LEJA0506]

Good points, helpless face is cool & also the grunt post punch. 1 leg drag’s great as well. Agree on visual can over imagination but both are good, I’d like to see half and half with two great legs sticking out from behind something maybe (ie a pair of legs).

[The Sick One]

Personally, anything works for me as long as the victim is tied up and gagged and not killed.

[Stormtrooper1990]

Personally, anything works for me as long as the victim is tied up and gagged and not killed.

I might just surprise everyone but I'am not really a fan of bondage or gagging victims, I now considering most of my non lethal content does feature bound and gagged victims in some form. If it's going to be non-lethal then I much prefer the victim be injected with some sedative or a gas that keeps the naked/under clad victim in sleepyland, and buys the infiltrator much needed time to stash her away or have a little fun with her first. After all, who as the time to lug around rolls of tape or rope to secure her victim.


And like I may have mentioned before, I'am not really fussed about the whole "lethal-non lethal." debate, I appreciate both as long as a woman ends up with her uniform/clothes off and it's a woman that does it for disguise purposes, then I'am happy.

My final point is this; as a writer I feel that context is the most important thing when it comes writing stories. Whether or not they match you're personal preferences. You have to explore and consider many scenarios without feeling their weight holding you back.

[The Sick One]

Personally, anything works for me as long as the victim is tied up and gagged and not killed.

I might just surprise everyone but I'am not really a fan of bondage or gagging victims, I now considering most of my non lethal content does feature bound and gagged victims in some form. If it's going to be non-lethal then I much prefer the victim be injected with some sedative or a gas that keeps the naked/under clad victim in sleepyland, and buys the infiltrator much needed time to stash her away or have a little fun with her first. After all, who as the time to lug around rolls of tape or rope to secure her victim.


And like I may have mentioned before, I'am not really fussed about the whole "lethal-non lethal." debate, I appreciate both as long as a woman ends up with her uniform/clothes off and it's a woman that does it for disguise purposes, then I'am happy.

My final point is this; as a writer I feel that context is the most important thing when it comes writing stories. Whether or not they match you're personal preferences. You have to explore and consider many scenarios without feeling their weight holding you back.

Hm, didn't expect to get crucified for a simple answer to a simple question, but you do you, mate.

I mean, I agree with the "context is the most important thing when it comes writing stories"-part and that preferences shouldn't prevent a writer from trying new things but your comment comes off to me as someone chastising another person for hating burritos just because they said they like tacos.

My point is that you're making a hen out of a feather, my brother (and yes, I'm fully aware of the irony of making a point about this, but I thought it needed to be stated).

Still, this isn't meant as a giant "FuCk yOu, i'M nEVeR WrOng!1!" towards you, more as a heads up to not react to something that has no other meaning than what is plain to see, especially when it comes off as someone preaching the most obvious stuff for not other reason than their own validation (again, fully aware of the irony here, but in this situation it has to be stated).

[Stormtrooper1990]

Personally, anything works for me as long as the victim is tied up and gagged and not killed.

I might just surprise everyone but I'am not really a fan of bondage or gagging victims, I now considering most of my non lethal content does feature bound and gagged victims in some form. If it's going to be non-lethal then I much prefer the victim be injected with some sedative or a gas that keeps the naked/under clad victim in sleepyland, and buys the infiltrator much needed time to stash her away or have a little fun with her first. After all, who as the time to lug around rolls of tape or rope to secure her victim.


And like I may have mentioned before, I'am not really fussed about the whole "lethal-non lethal." debate, I appreciate both as long as a woman ends up with her uniform/clothes off and it's a woman that does it for disguise purposes, then I'am happy.

My final point is this; as a writer I feel that context is the most important thing when it comes writing stories. Whether or not they match you're personal preferences. You have to explore and consider many scenarios without feeling their weight holding you back.

Hm, didn't expect to get crucified for a simple answer to a simple question, but you do you, mate.

I mean, I agree with the "context is the most important thing when it comes writing stories"-part and that preferences shouldn't prevent a writer from trying new things but your comment comes off to me as someone chastising another person for hating burritos just because they said they like tacos.

My point is that you're making a hen out of a feather, my brother (and yes, I'm fully aware of the irony of making a point about this, but I thought it needed to be stated).

Still, this isn't meant as a giant "FuCk yOu, i'M nEVeR WrOng!1!" towards you, more as a heads up to not react to something that has no other meaning than what is plain to see, especially when it comes off as someone preaching the most obvious stuff for not other reason than their own validation (again, fully aware of the irony here, but in this situation it has to be stated).

I'am sorry that I offended you with this and i didn't mean to it was meant to be just a statement not addressed to you specifically but it came out all wrong. It's just sometimes I get knee jerky and not a little outspoken when I talk about my own preferences to the other writers and this wasn't meant as a condescending remark to you at all. I think its healthy that everyone is a little different on the board and that this shouldn't be discouraged. In my defence I have been told by many people that I do have a habit for putting my foot in my mouth, so again my apologies.

I don't seek my own validation, the only thing I want to do on this board is write and share my work with the rest of the community. If people love it than excellent! If others don't well I just take it in my stride, keep calm and carry on. Take the good with the bad.

And to end on a much lighter note; I have never had a taco or a burrito we don't get much Mexican food here in the UK. Which would you recommend?

[The Sick One]

I might just surprise everyone but I'am not really a fan of bondage or gagging victims, I now considering most of my non lethal content does feature bound and gagged victims in some form. If it's going to be non-lethal then I much prefer the victim be injected with some sedative or a gas that keeps the naked/under clad victim in sleepyland, and buys the infiltrator much needed time to stash her away or have a little fun with her first. After all, who as the time to lug around rolls of tape or rope to secure her victim.


And like I may have mentioned before, I'am not really fussed about the whole "lethal-non lethal." debate, I appreciate both as long as a woman ends up with her uniform/clothes off and it's a woman that does it for disguise purposes, then I'am happy.

My final point is this; as a writer I feel that context is the most important thing when it comes writing stories. Whether or not they match you're personal preferences. You have to explore and consider many scenarios without feeling their weight holding you back.

Hm, didn't expect to get crucified for a simple answer to a simple question, but you do you, mate.

I mean, I agree with the "context is the most important thing when it comes writing stories"-part and that preferences shouldn't prevent a writer from trying new things but your comment comes off to me as someone chastising another person for hating burritos just because they said they like tacos.

My point is that you're making a hen out of a feather, my brother (and yes, I'm fully aware of the irony of making a point about this, but I thought it needed to be stated).

Still, this isn't meant as a giant "FuCk yOu, i'M nEVeR WrOng!1!" towards you, more as a heads up to not react to something that has no other meaning than what is plain to see, especially when it comes off as someone preaching the most obvious stuff for not other reason than their own validation (again, fully aware of the irony here, but in this situation it has to be stated).

I'am sorry that I offended you with this and i didn't mean to it was meant to be just a statement not addressed to you specifically but it came out all wrong. It's just sometimes I get knee jerky and not a little outspoken when I talk about my own preferences to the other writers and this wasn't meant as a condescending remark to you at all. I think its healthy that everyone is a little different on the board and that this shouldn't be discouraged. In my defence I have been told by many people that I do have a habit for putting my foot in my mouth, so again my apologies.

I don't seek my own validation, the only thing I want to do on this board is write and share my work with the rest of the community. If people love it than excellent! If others don't well I just take it in my stride, keep calm and carry on. Take the good with the bad.

And to end on a much lighter note; I have never had a taco or a burrito we don't get much Mexican food here in the UK. Which would you recommend?

I apologise myself if I came off as a hyper-defensive prick, which was not my intent, especially since again, I agree with you. As you humorously proposed, let's draw a line over this with some Mexican delicacies:

I personally prefer burritos and fajitas over tacos and nachos, but they are still great, especially with some guacamole and salsa.

[Stormtrooper1990]

Hm, didn't expect to get crucified for a simple answer to a simple question, but you do you, mate.

I mean, I agree with the "context is the most important thing when it comes writing stories"-part and that preferences shouldn't prevent a writer from trying new things but your comment comes off to me as someone chastising another person for hating burritos just because they said they like tacos.

My point is that you're making a hen out of a feather, my brother (and yes, I'm fully aware of the irony of making a point about this, but I thought it needed to be stated).

Still, this isn't meant as a giant "FuCk yOu, i'M nEVeR WrOng!1!" towards you, more as a heads up to not react to something that has no other meaning than what is plain to see, especially when it comes off as someone preaching the most obvious stuff for not other reason than their own validation (again, fully aware of the irony here, but in this situation it has to be stated).

I'am sorry that I offended you with this and i didn't mean to it was meant to be just a statement not addressed to you specifically but it came out all wrong. It's just sometimes I get knee jerky and not a little outspoken when I talk about my own preferences to the other writers and this wasn't meant as a condescending remark to you at all. I think its healthy that everyone is a little different on the board and that this shouldn't be discouraged. In my defence I have been told by many people that I do have a habit for putting my foot in my mouth, so again my apologies.

I don't seek my own validation, the only thing I want to do on this board is write and share my work with the rest of the community. If people love it than excellent! If others don't well I just take it in my stride, keep calm and carry on. Take the good with the bad.

And to end on a much lighter note; I have never had a taco or a burrito we don't get much Mexican food here in the UK. Which would you recommend?

I apologise myself if I came off as a hyper-defensive prick, which was not my intent, especially since again, I agree with you. As you humorously proposed, let's draw a line over this with some Mexican delicacies:

I personally prefer burritos and fajitas over tacos and nachos, but they are still great, especially with some guacamole and salsa.

No worries mate, apologies warmly received.

Mmm, that does sound delicious I will take that under advisement, thank you. There does happen to be a Taco Bell near where I live so I will pop in and give both a try when i travel to town. Although perhaps not at the same time.