


Hard to choose, honestly. On the spot though, I'd say 'Hashtag's Are SO Last Decade'. Bianca is truly a unique antagonist among your stories, and even among all the stories of this Board. The other propositions all sound interesting, but they either feature elements that we saw very recently in another story of yours (a Tina/Angel partnership, the taking on a full security team) or storylines that are classics on the Board (the infiltration of a base, the taking on a full security team). Therefore, I'd personally choose 'Hashtag's Are SO Last Decade', because it's the one which has the stories that seem the harder to predict. Plus, let's be honest, I smell good comedy between her and Stasis, and such a light-hearted story probably won't be able to fit later in the series when the phantoms and the company take the spotlight again. (Although I admit that it pains me to postpone a Tina/Angel team-up.

As for the other, 'Sister's, Uniforms & Gadgets' sounds like a nice idea to feature the return of the phantoms - so perhaps saving it for last would be a good thing.
'Oil, Sweat & Tears' is interesting because it will be a focus chapter on Tinker, who never was at the foreground before.
'Izanagi's Burden' features a Tina/Angel partnership, so I'm already sold, but honestly I'm a little more mixed about the idea for your antagonist. By herself, she has a classic backstory, though one that could lead to interesting developments and interactions with someone like Tina. However, you present it as if infiltrators and phantoms are two tightknit factions at war, which doesn't seem to be how they were presented until now: while phantoms are a tightknit group, infiltrators clearly aren't, and most of the infiltrators don't even know that phantoms exist; therefore, while I can certainly see why she'd be shunned by phantoms, I find it harder to see why she'd be shunned by infiltrators. Plus, while phantoms are shown to be a group united by a common ideology, fanatics one could say, infiltrators are mostly in it for the money, not because of an ideology.